<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: foo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/</link>
	<description>Computer Science and Teaching and Other Ancillary Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMC</title>
		<link>http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/comment-page-1/#comment-16706</link>
		<dc:creator>JMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/#comment-16706</guid>
		<description>Why would the usage of a dummy word like foo or bar turn people away from programming?? Chances are, they weren&#039;t going to dig it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the usage of a dummy word like foo or bar turn people away from programming?? Chances are, they weren&#39;t going to dig it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>JMC, your comment that people who are turned off by FOO wouldn&#039;t like programming anyway presupposes that people are either &quot;programmers&quot; or &quot;not programmers&quot;.  If we move away from that view into a more realistic vision where people have differing aptitudes for the subject, then it makes a lot of sense to put as few stupid hurdles up as possible.  Because in that case, every extra hurdle decreases by a small amount the number of people who will understand the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMC, your comment that people who are turned off by FOO wouldn&#8217;t like programming anyway presupposes that people are either &#8220;programmers&#8221; or &#8220;not programmers&#8221;.  If we move away from that view into a more realistic vision where people have differing aptitudes for the subject, then it makes a lot of sense to put as few stupid hurdles up as possible.  Because in that case, every extra hurdle decreases by a small amount the number of people who will understand the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://jes5199.com/</title>
		<link>http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>http://jes5199.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>When I was in college2, I was in the middle of explain the concept of widgets (i.e. GUI libs) to a friend, and I happened to use &quot;monkey&quot; as my placeholder. My then-roommate overheard and euphemismed loudly &quot;monkeys with widgets!? What the hell are you talking about??&quot; and, for him, this forever poisoned the word &quot;monkey&quot; -- such that whenever I was talking about /anything/ and monkeys happened to wander in, he would start raving about widgets (which was, to him, even more meaningless than monkeys are to me)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in college2, I was in the middle of explain the concept of widgets (i.e. GUI libs) to a friend, and I happened to use &#8220;monkey&#8221; as my placeholder. My then-roommate overheard and euphemismed loudly &#8220;monkeys with widgets!? What the hell are you talking about??&#8221; and, for him, this forever poisoned the word &#8220;monkey&#8221; &#8212; such that whenever I was talking about /anything/ and monkeys happened to wander in, he would start raving about widgets (which was, to him, even more meaningless than monkeys are to me)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMC</title>
		<link>http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>JMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>Why would the usage of a dummy word like foo or bar turn people away from programming?? Chances are, they weren&#039;t going to dig it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the usage of a dummy word like foo or bar turn people away from programming?? Chances are, they weren&#8217;t going to dig it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeke</title>
		<link>http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>zeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprompt.us/2007/foo/#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t use Foo nor Bar.  I prefer crap, shit, dung, poop, choad, and monkey as my scratch variables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use Foo nor Bar.  I prefer crap, shit, dung, poop, choad, and monkey as my scratch variables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
